January 2 – January 16, 2026

Morgan Housel's wealth equation ("what you have minus what you want") directly applies to Brian's solopreneur journey and side project monetization decisions. The focus on psychology over tactics aligns with Brian's preference for practical frameworks, though the lack of technical/entrepreneurial angles limits immediate writing potential.

This is a practical new tool in Brian's exact tech stack (Cloudflare Workers + AI) that solves a real automation problem he likely faces in his side projects. The ability to convert various document formats to markdown via a simple API call opens up immediate possibilities for content processing workflows, especially given his interest in AI integrations and automation.

Brian is perfectly positioned to write a contrarian take on AGI hype versus the reality of building production AI systems. His hands-on experience with AI integrations, webhook systems, and automation gives him credible ground to either validate or debunk these claims with concrete examples.

This is a detailed deep-dive into orchestrating 10-30+ Claude instances simultaneously for massive coding productivity gains. While the tool itself is extremely early/experimental, the architectural patterns and "stages of AI developer evolution" framework are immediately relevant to Brian's workflow optimization and side project automation goals.

This hits Brian's sweet spot of product positioning and AI tooling - he'd likely have strong opinions on whether Claude Cowork's success really comes from solving "simple" problems or from deeper workflow improvements. The "everyone's talking about it for the wrong reason" framing is exactly the kind of contrarian take Brian would want to dissect from his experience building actual AI-powered tools.

This is a systematic approach to the exact problem Brian faces: how do you develop professionally, build side projects, stay fit for triathlon, and be present for family without burning out? The framework's emphasis on **practical problem-solving over abstract philosophy** aligns perfectly with Brian's "here's what I learned building X" writing style.

This hits Brian's sweet spot of AI agents solving real engineering problems with concrete metrics (10-20x question increase, 1,800+ answered). The technical implementation details around context management and agentic tooling directly apply to his fintech work, and the "automating workflows" angle could spark ideas for his side projects.

This is a detailed technical case study of exactly the kind of AI agent system Brian would likely want to build for his own dev workflows. The implementation details around Modal sandboxes, multiplayer sessions, and multi-client interfaces align perfectly with his serverless/CDK expertise and obsession with developer productivity automation.

This aligns with Brian's approach of building tools he actually wants to use rather than chasing trendy markets. As someone juggling fintech work, side projects, and family, he's likely experienced both the motivation of passion projects vs. purely money-driven work. The "focus on craft, money follows" thesis is something he could validate or challenge with concrete examples.

This is a beautifully executed knowledge synthesis tool that connects patterns across books into actionable mental models - exactly the kind of systematic thinking Brian applies to engineering problems. The site demonstrates sophisticated information architecture and could inspire both technical implementation ideas and content frameworks for his own writing about engineering patterns.

This is a well-crafted annual reflection guide that Brian could use for his own planning, but more importantly, it represents a successful productized coaching offering that aligns with his interests in automation and scaling expertise. The 50,000+ downloads across 80+ countries demonstrates strong product-market fit for what is essentially a structured framework delivered digitally.

This hits directly on Brian's experience as a senior engineer at a fintech startup navigating remote work dynamics. The specific challenges around mentoring, cross-team collaboration, and innovation align with problems he likely faces daily when building integrations and working with distributed teams.

Vibecraft is a 3D visualization tool for managing Claude Code instances - essentially a fancy UI for watching AI agents work on your machine. This hits Brian's sweet spot of AI/agent tooling and developer productivity, and he'd likely have strong opinions about whether visual monitoring adds real value or is just eye candy for the agent workflow space.

This hits Brian's solopreneur mindset and the constant juggling of priorities between day job, side projects, family, and fitness. The "identity-first" approach to goal-setting could resonate with someone managing multiple domains, though the "fix your life in 1 day" framing is probably too clickbait-y for his direct writing style.

This is a structured annual reflection template focused on "relationality" - examining how everything in life is interconnected through relationships. While Brian isn't typically drawn to pure self-help content, the systematic approach to reflection and the emphasis on commitment/action (Murray quote) could resonate with his productivity and goal-setting mindset.

This is solid, practical engineering content that aligns with Brian's preference for "here's what works" over abstract theory. While shell scripting isn't cutting-edge, it's foundational for automation workflows, deployment scripts, and developer productivity—all areas Brian cares about. The timing might be right since he's likely writing more scripts for AI integrations and side project automation.

This is just a domain parking page for "look.to" that becomes available January 21st. There's no actual content here - just a backorder opportunity for what appears to be a short, potentially valuable domain name.

This is just a landing page for Dan Koe's productivity/lifestyle newsletter, not actual content. The article titles suggest generic self-improvement content that doesn't align with Brian's technical focus or practical writing style. No actionable insights here for a senior engineer.

This is a well-written piece about dog domestication, but it's completely outside Brian's wheelhouse. While there might be loose parallels to AI/human relationships or symbiotic automation, they'd be forced and not authentic to his voice or expertise.

While self-awareness and personal growth are valuable, this psychological/therapeutic angle doesn't align with Brian's technical focus or practical writing style. He's more likely to write about concrete systems and tools than introspective personal development concepts.